<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>sebthom.de &#187; WebSphere Portal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sebthom.de/category/it/websphere_portal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sebthom.de</link>
	<description>IT Freelancer - Java, J2EE, IBM WebSphere Portal, Lotus Notes/Domino</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:10:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Installing WebSphere Portal in a local network</title>
		<link>http://sebthom.de/138-installing-websphere-portal-local-network/</link>
		<comments>http://sebthom.de/138-installing-websphere-portal-local-network/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian Thomschke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[WebSphere Portal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[websphere portal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workaround]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sebthom.de/?p=138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[     <link rel="alternate" type="application/atom+xml" title="sebthom.de Category: WebSphere Portal" href="http://sebthom.de/category/it/websphere_portal/feed/" />
Recently I had to setup some WebSphere Portal 6.1 installations in VMWares within a private network. Unfortunately the portal installer aborted with the following message &#8220;EJPIC0067E: Portal requires a fully qualified host name that is recoganized by the DNS Server.&#8221; Even when adding the fully qualified hostname to the hosts file the installer may still [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently I had to setup some WebSphere Portal 6.1 installations in VMWares within a private network. Unfortunately the portal installer aborted with the following message &#8220;EJPIC0067E: Portal requires a fully qualified host name that is recoganized by the DNS Server.&#8221; Even when adding the fully qualified hostname to the hosts file the installer may still fail with the same message.<br />
The workaround is to disable the hostname check by invoking the portal installer with the following parameter specified: <strong>-W nodeHost.active=&#8221;False&#8221;</strong>. You should however only do this for test or development installations.</p>
 <img src="http://sebthom.de/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=138" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" /><hr />
<p><small>&copy; sebthom for <a href="http://sebthom.de">sebthom.de</a>, 2009. |
<a href="http://sebthom.de/138-installing-websphere-portal-local-network/">Permalink</a> |
<a href="http://sebthom.de/138-installing-websphere-portal-local-network/#comments">3 comments</a> |
Add to
<a href="http://del.icio.us/post?url=http://sebthom.de/138-installing-websphere-portal-local-network/&amp;title=Installing WebSphere Portal in a local network">del.icio.us</a>
<br/>
Post tags: <a href="http://sebthom.de/tag/deployment/" rel="nofollow tag">deployment</a>, <a href="http://sebthom.de/tag/websphere-portal/" rel="nofollow tag">websphere portal</a>, <a href="http://sebthom.de/tag/workaround/" rel="nofollow tag">workaround</a><br/>
</small></p>
<p><small>Feed enhanced by <a href='http://planetozh.com/blog/my-projects/wordpress-plugin-better-feed-rss/'>Better Feed</a> from  <a href='http://planetozh.com/blog/'>Ozh</a></small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sebthom.de/138-installing-websphere-portal-local-network/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WebSphere Portal 6.1.0.0 does not support installation on a managed node</title>
		<link>http://sebthom.de/67-websphere-portal-6100-does-not-support-installation-on-a-managed-node/</link>
		<comments>http://sebthom.de/67-websphere-portal-6100-does-not-support-installation-on-a-managed-node/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 19:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian Thomschke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[WebSphere Portal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[websphere portal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sebthom.de/67-websphere-portal-6100-does-not-support-installation-on-a-managed-node/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With WebSphere Portal 5.1 a new deployment option was introduced that allowed the installation of WP onto an existing node managed by a deployment manager. AFAIK the main reason for this new option was to simplify the cluster setup procedure.
Both options, installing WP standalone and federating it into a cell afterwards as well as installing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With WebSphere Portal 5.1 a new deployment option was introduced that allowed the installation of WP onto an existing node managed by a deployment manager. AFAIK the main reason for this new option was to simplify the cluster setup procedure.</p>
<p>Both options, installing WP standalone and federating it into a cell afterwards as well as installing it on an already managed node have different pros and cons each. In WP 6.0 the installation onto a managed node was even mandatory to enable WebSphere Process Server integration.</p>
<p>Surprisingly WP6.1.0.0 does not support the installation on a managed node anymore. All nodes of a cluster need to be installed as standalone systems first and then be federated into a WebSphere cell.</p>
<p>For WP 6.0 the installation procedure is described <a href="http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/wpdoc/v6r0/topic/com.ibm.wp.ent.doc/wpf/clus_install_primary_fed.html" rel="nofollow"  target="_blank">here</a>. The 6.1 info center does not mention this procedure anymore and it no, it was not dropped accidentally.</p>
 <img src="http://sebthom.de/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=67" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" /><hr />
<p><small>&copy; sebthom for <a href="http://sebthom.de">sebthom.de</a>, 2008. |
<a href="http://sebthom.de/67-websphere-portal-6100-does-not-support-installation-on-a-managed-node/">Permalink</a> |
<a href="http://sebthom.de/67-websphere-portal-6100-does-not-support-installation-on-a-managed-node/#comments">No comment</a> |
Add to
<a href="http://del.icio.us/post?url=http://sebthom.de/67-websphere-portal-6100-does-not-support-installation-on-a-managed-node/&amp;title=WebSphere Portal 6.1.0.0 does not support installation on a managed node">del.icio.us</a>
<br/>
Post tags: <a href="http://sebthom.de/tag/deployment/" rel="nofollow tag">deployment</a>, <a href="http://sebthom.de/tag/limitation/" rel="nofollow tag">limitation</a>, <a href="http://sebthom.de/tag/websphere-portal/" rel="nofollow tag">websphere portal</a><br/>
</small></p>
<p><small>Feed enhanced by <a href='http://planetozh.com/blog/my-projects/wordpress-plugin-better-feed-rss/'>Better Feed</a> from  <a href='http://planetozh.com/blog/'>Ozh</a></small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sebthom.de/67-websphere-portal-6100-does-not-support-installation-on-a-managed-node/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
